Gagan Thapa is often seen as the voice of Nepal’s younger generation inside the Nepali Congress. He has spoken about reforms, anti-corruption, and accountability, building an image as a modern politician. But the Gen Z Revolution changed how many youths view him. During the protests, his own house was burnt — a sign of frustration that even “youth leaders” within old parties are no longer trusted.
Questions for the community:
- Does the burning of Gagan Thapa’s house show a loss of faith in him as a youth leader?
- Can he still represent change, or has he become part of the establishment problem?
- Should he lead reforms inside Congress, or break away to truly represent youth voices?
- How do young Nepalis compare him with leaders like Rabi Lamichhane or Balen Shah?
- Is Gagan Thapa Nepal’s best hope for balancing traditional party politics with youth-driven demands?
Some say he is the most promising reformist in mainstream politics. Others argue the anger against him shows that youth no longer believe in leaders tied to old parties.
What do you think — is Gagan Thapa still a youth leader, or has he lost his credibility?